{"id":27385,"date":"2020-11-05T17:25:35","date_gmt":"2020-11-05T16:25:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ulqini-online.com\/sajti\/?p=27385"},"modified":"2020-11-05T17:25:35","modified_gmt":"2020-11-05T16:25:35","slug":"dilemat-e-regjistrimit-te-popullsise-ne-kohen-e-pandemise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ulqini-online.com\/sajti\/?p=27385","title":{"rendered":"DILEMAT E REGJISTRIMIT T\u00cb POPULLSIS\u00cb N\u00cb KOH\u00cbN E PANDEMIS\u00cb"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Diskursi demografik<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Propozimi nga nj\u00eb OJQ q\u00eb n\u00eb regjistrimin e ardhsh\u00ebm t\u00eb popullsis\u00eb q\u00eb do t\u00eb mbahet n\u00eb Mal t\u00eb Zi n\u00eb muajin prill t\u00eb vitit t\u00eb ardhsh\u00ebm q\u00eb mos t\u00eb evidentohet struktura komb\u00ebtare, gjuh\u00ebsore e fetare e popullsis\u00eb sikurse n\u00eb regjistrimet e deritashme(1948-2011) \u00ebsht\u00eb irituese dhe e papranueshme, sepse \u00e7do qytetar p\u00ebrve\u00e7 emrit dhe mbiemrit \u00a0ka identitetin\u00a0 e vet, nd\u00ebrsa \u00e7do eliminim i k\u00ebtyre strukturave\u00a0 \u00ebsht\u00eb\u00a0 mohim i\u00a0 t\u00eb drejtave e lirive t\u00eb qytetar\u00ebve n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsi e pakicave komb\u00ebtare n\u00eb ve\u00e7anti, sidomos p\u00ebr ne shqiptar\u00ebt\u00a0 sepse do t\u00eb eliminohej instituti i aksionit afirmativ\u00a0 si dhe p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimi i tyre autentik, andaj si i till\u00eb ky propozim \u00ebsht\u00eb i pa pranuesh\u00ebm dhe diskriminues. \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nail  Draga<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dit\u00eb m\u00eb par\u00eb  opinioni n\u00eb Mal t\u00eb Zi \u00ebsht\u00eb njohtuar me propozimin nga  Qendra e Tranzicionit Demokratik(CDT) q\u00eb  ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me regjistrimin e popullsis\u00eb q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb organizohet gjat\u00eb muajit prill t\u00eb vitit t\u00eb ardhsh\u00ebm. Propozimi \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtuar n\u00eb adresa t\u00eb ndryshme si presidentit t\u00eb Malit t\u00eb Zi, kryetarit t\u00eb Kuvendit t\u00eb Malit t\u00eb Zi, kryeministrit aktual, mandatarit p\u00ebr formimin e qeveris\u00eb, partive politike etj., duke njoftuar me propozimin qe ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me iniciativ\u00ebn p\u00ebr  mos deklarimin e qytetar\u00ebve sipas p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsis\u00eb nacionale, fetare e gjuh\u00ebsore(!). Dhe p\u00ebr \u00e7udi nj\u00eb propozim i till\u00eb u b\u00eb objekt reagimi i subjekt\u00ebve politike, shoq\u00ebris\u00eb civile e individ\u00ebve t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm, duke shprehur pik\u00ebpamjet e tyre n\u00eb lidhje me k\u00ebt\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje e cila k\u00ebtu q\u00eb nga fillimi   ka marr\u00eb p\u00ebrmasa politizuese.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dilema e identitetit<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nuk ka dilem\u00eb se nj\u00eb propozim i till\u00eb jep p\u00ebr t\u00eb kuptuar se kemi t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb me nj\u00eb mjedis ku qytetar\u00ebt nuk  jan\u00eb t\u00eb vetdijsh\u00ebm  se kush jan\u00eb e \u00e7ka jan\u00eb, p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsisht kan\u00eb  dilema sa i p\u00ebrket\u00ebt identitetit t\u00eb tyre komb\u00ebtar, fetar e gjuh\u00ebsor. Por, th\u00ebn\u00eb m\u00eb se buti  kemi t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb me   nen\u00e7mim t\u00eb dinjitetit t\u00eb qytetar\u00ebve. Sepse nj\u00eb propozim i till\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb d\u00ebshifrohet ndryshe n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb koh\u00eb t\u00eb pluralizmit ku qytetar\u00ebt kan\u00eb mund\u00ebsi t\u00eb deklarohen lirsh\u00ebm, n\u00eb \u00e7do pyetje n\u00eb flet\u00ebn e regjistrimit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Por si\u00e7 duket realiteti  politik  ka ndryshuar nga del se deri m\u00eb tash pushteti ka pasur monopol, duke prezantuar struktur\u00ebn e popullsis\u00eb sipas interesit t\u00eb tyre, qe jep p\u00ebr t\u00eb kuptuar se n\u00eb t\u00eb kaluar\u00ebn jan\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb manipulime n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim. Dhe k\u00ebtu qendron \u00e7\u00ebshtja se nj\u00eb regjistrim objektiv do t\u00eb ofroj\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebna tjera num\u00ebrike e jo si deri m\u00eb tash t\u00eb cilat jan\u00eb prezantuar opinionit. Kryesisht \u00ebsht\u00eb fjala p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebtar\u00ebt e popullit serb t\u00eb cil\u00ebt  realisht jan\u00eb m\u00eb tep\u00ebr se sa i ka paraqitur deri m\u00eb tash statistika zyrtare. Nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb pozit\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb favorshme nuk jan\u00eb as pjes\u00ebtar\u00ebt e popullit boshnjak, shqiptar e ati kroat, q\u00eb d\u00ebshmohet nga analiza  e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave  n\u00eb regjistrimet e popullsis\u00eb nga viti 1948 e m\u00eb pas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nga regjistrimet ideologjike t\u00eb ato pluraliste<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Regjistrimi i pare i popullsis\u00eb pas Luft\u00ebs s\u00eb Dyt\u00eb Bot\u00ebrore n\u00eb Mal t\u00eb Zi u mbajt n\u00eb vitin 1948 dhe ofroj\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e para sipas struktur\u00ebs komb\u00ebtare t\u00eb qytetar\u00ebve, e drejt kjo e mohuar m\u00eb par\u00eb (p\u00ebrve\u00e7 serb\u00ebve). K\u00ebshtu n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb vit si malazez jan\u00eb deklaruar   90.67%, serb  1.78 %, nd\u00ebrsa shqiptar\u00eb       5.15%.  Kujtojm\u00eb me k\u00ebt\u00eb rast se regjistrimet e popullsis\u00eb n\u00eb koh\u00ebn e monizmit ishin  ideologjike dhe t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e ndryshme duhet trajtuar n\u00eb kontekst t\u00eb rrethanave politike t\u00eb koh\u00ebs, ku nuk kan\u00eb munguar diskriminimi p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsisht  manipulimet me struktur\u00ebn komb\u00ebtare t\u00eb popullsis\u00eb. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb aspekt rasti i serb\u00ebve paraqet rast specifik sepse t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat d\u00ebshmojn\u00eb me mund\u00ebsin\u00eb e manipulimit  t\u00eb numrit t\u00eb tyre deri n\u00eb regjistrimet e vitit 1991. Sepse nuk mund t\u00eb arsyetohet me asnj\u00eb argument pjes\u00ebmarrja e serb\u00ebve n\u00eb vitin 1948 me 1.78%, duke e ditur se ata ishin m\u00eb shum\u00eb, e dh\u00ebn\u00eb kjo e cila ishte e diskutueshme  deri n\u00eb vitin 1991.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb aspekt nuk kan\u00eb qen\u00eb n\u00eb pozit\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb favorshme as shqiptar\u00ebt, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt vazhdimisht ishin nga 5-7%, e dh\u00ebn\u00eb e cila nuk ishte objektive sepse shqiptar\u00eb ka pasur m\u00eb tep\u00ebr. Nd\u00ebrsa boshnjak\u00ebt nuk ishin t\u00eb pranuar me k\u00ebt\u00eb em\u00ebr por me p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsin\u00eb fetare si musliman\u00eb dhe me num\u00ebr t\u00eb pa p\u00ebrfillsh\u00ebm n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb popullsis\u00eb s\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithshme, duke i trajtuar kryesisht si malazez n\u00eb aspektin komb\u00ebtar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Vet\u00ebm regjistrimet e popullsis\u00eb n\u00eb pluraliz\u00ebm, pas vitit 1991, ofruan mund\u00ebsi t\u00eb paraqitjes me objektive t\u00eb struktur\u00ebs komb\u00ebtare t\u00eb popullsis\u00eb n\u00eb Mal t\u00eb Zi, duke eliminuar deformimet strukturore t\u00eb koh\u00ebs moniste. Nj\u00eb dukuri e till\u00eb ishte identike n\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha vendet e ish kampit socialist, ku as   Mali i Zi nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Identiteti i mohuar apo manipulimi i programuar<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ndryshimet m\u00eb t\u00eb theksuara n\u00eb struktur\u00ebn komb\u00ebtare t\u00eb popullsis\u00eb jan\u00eb paraqitur pas vitit 1991, me miratimin e pluralizmit, ku mund\u00ebsia e deklarimit ka qen\u00eb e lir\u00eb, nd\u00ebrsa rasti i serb\u00ebve \u00ebsht\u00eb  d\u00ebshmi e nj\u00eb ndryshimi strukturor. K\u00ebshtu n\u00eb vitin 1991, sipas regjistimit t\u00eb popullsi\u00eb jan\u00eb deklaruar si serb 9.34 %, nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb regjistrimin vijues n\u00eb vitin 2003 jan\u00eb deklaruar 31.99%, nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb vitin 2011, ishin 28.73%. T\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e tilla d\u00ebshmojn\u00eb s\u00eb numri i serb\u00ebve \u00ebsht\u00eb trefishuar, q\u00eb paraqet rast p\u00ebr hulumtim  q\u00eb d\u00ebshmohet  me regjistrimin objektiv n\u00eb krahasim n\u00eb koh\u00ebn e monizmit. Nga ana tjet\u00ebr malazez\u00ebt  kan\u00eb p\u00ebsuar nj\u00eb r\u00ebnie drastike nga viti 1948 q\u00eb ishin 90.67%  n\u00eb 44.98%, n\u00eb vitin 2011, nga del se ka ekzistuar manipulimi i evidentimit t\u00eb qytetar\u00ebve n\u00eb aspektin komb\u00ebtar nga ana e pushtetit t\u00eb koh\u00ebs. Nuk ka dilem\u00eb se numri I serb\u00ebve n\u00eb Mal t\u00eb Zi \u00ebsht\u00eb pa dyshim  m\u00eb s\u00eb paku nj\u00eb e treta e popullsis\u00eb s\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithshme, q\u00eb sipas t\u00eb gjitha gjasave kjo pjes\u00ebmarrje do t\u00eb rritet gjithnj\u00eb ku regjistrimi n\u00eb vitin 2021 do t\u00eb d\u00ebshmoj me konkretisht nj\u00eb konstatim t\u00eb till\u00eb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Regjistrimi duhet t\u00eb paraqes\u00eb gjendj\u00ebn reale demografike<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Inicuesit e nj\u00eb propozimi t\u00eb till\u00eb mbeshtet\u00ebt  n\u00eb praktik\u00ebn europiane  s\u00eb pyetjet p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtjet e tilla nuk jan\u00eb obligative, nd\u00ebrsa harrojn\u00eb se \u00ebsht\u00eb e drejt autonome e s\u00eb cilit indvid t\u00eb deklarohet se kush \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb aspektin komb\u00ebtar, gjuh\u00ebsor e fetar. Nd\u00ebrsa p\u00ebr ata t\u00eb cil\u00ebt nuk d\u00ebshirojn\u00eb t\u00eb deklarohen mund\u00ebsia ka ekzistuar edhe m\u00eb par\u00eb, por ka qen\u00eb nj\u00eb num\u00ebr minimal q\u00eb e kan\u00eb shfryt\u00ebzuar at\u00eb mund\u00ebsi. Duke marr\u00eb parasysh se deri m\u00eb tash k\u00ebto rubrika kan\u00eb qen\u00eb standarde n\u00eb regjistrimet e popullsis\u00eb(1948-2011) duke paraqitur identitetin dhe pjes\u00ebmarrj\u00ebn  n\u00eb popullsin\u00eb e p\u00ebrgjithshme t\u00eb pjes\u00ebtar\u00ebve t\u00eb popujve t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm, \u00e7do devijim n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb aspekt \u00ebsht\u00eb d\u00ebshtim me pasoja shoq\u00ebrore. Nd\u00ebrsa koncepti i \u201cshtetit  qytetar\u201d n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb mjedis t\u00eb pakonsoliduar ma tep\u00ebr ka karakter t\u00eb marketingut politik se sa t\u00eb realitetit shoq\u00ebror.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pik\u00ebrisht duke njohur rrethanat shoq\u00ebrore n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb mjedis m\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb b\u00ebh\u00ebt pyetja se \u00e7far\u00eb mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb nj\u00eb regjistrim i till\u00eb i popullsis\u00eb pa strukturat e identitetit si\u00e7 jan\u00eb ajo nacionale, fetare e gjuh\u00ebsore. Ose edhe m\u00eb qart\u00eb kush i frigohet realitetit demografik n\u00eb Mal t\u00eb Zi si bashk\u00ebsi multinacionale, multikulturore e multifetare, e popujve t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pasi nj\u00eb propozim i till\u00eb ndodhi pas zgjedhjeve parlamentare t\u00eb 30 gushtit 2020, ku DPS-i i humbi zgjedhjet p\u00ebr t\u00eb par\u00ebn her\u00eb n\u00eb pluraliz\u00ebm pas tridhjet\u00eb viteve, andaj nuk ka dilem\u00eb se nj\u00eb propozim I till\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb sponzorizuar nga ana e tyre, p\u00ebr qellime t\u00eb ve\u00e7anta.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nuk ka dilem\u00eb se regjistrimi i popullsis\u00eb paraqet sfid\u00eb p\u00ebr ata t\u00eb cil\u00ebt kan\u00eb manipuluar n\u00eb t\u00eb kaluar\u00ebn, andaj kan\u00eb frig\u00eb nga t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat objektive. Andaj k\u00ebsaj radhe jan\u00eb gjasat maksimale q\u00eb regjistrimi t\u00eb jet\u00eb objektiv p\u00ebr t\u00eb par\u00ebn her\u00eb sepse nga viti 1948-2011, ka qen\u00eb i realizuar n\u00ebn regjin\u00eb e pushtetit, andaj pushteti i ri duhet t\u00eb tregohet profesional duke eliminuar dilemat n\u00eb lidhje me struktur\u00ebn nacionale, gjuh\u00ebsore e fetare n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb objektive n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb mjedis.   <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Propozim  diskriminues<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

N\u00eb vendet e qytet\u00ebruara dhe demokratike regjistrimi I popullsis\u00eb paraqet \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb statistik\u00ebs demografike, duke ofruar t\u00eb dh\u00ebna shum\u00ebdimensionale p\u00ebr qytetar\u00ebt e vendit p\u00ebrkat\u00ebs. Por, kur kemi t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb me Malin e Zi, situata \u00ebsht\u00eb tjet\u00ebr fare sepse kemi t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb me nj\u00eb mjedis t\u00eb ndar\u00eb  dhe t\u00eb pakonsoliduar. Dhe nga nj\u00eb gjendje t\u00eb till\u00eb askush n\u00eb Mal t\u00eb Zi regjistrimin nuk e trajton si \u00e7\u00ebshtje teknike statistikore, por ekskluzivisht   me p\u00ebrmasa politike.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andaj, deklaratat e ndryshme nga disa t\u00eb vet\u00ebquajtur analist\u00eb se Regjistrimi i popullsis\u00eb do t\u00eb ndikoj\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebr\u00e7arjen e popullsis\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb manipulim i opinionit, sepse nj\u00eb dukuri e till\u00eb  k\u00ebtu ka qen\u00eb e vazhdueshme qe \u00ebsht\u00eb d\u00ebshmuar n\u00eb praktik\u00eb nga viti 2006, me rastin e refrendumit p\u00ebr pavar\u00ebsi  t\u00eb Malit t\u00eb Zi.
Nd\u00ebrsa \u00e7do tentim edhe  n\u00eb form\u00eb propozimi  p\u00ebr t\u00eb eliminuar deklarimin e  lir\u00eb t\u00eb qytetar\u00ebve sipas p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsis\u00eb komb\u00ebtare, gjuh\u00ebsore e fetare \u00ebsht\u00eb ide e d\u00ebshtuar, p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsisht mohim i demokracis\u00eb,  q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb kund\u00ebr barazis\u00eb nacionale e qytetare n\u00eb Mal t\u00eb Zi n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsi e popujve pakic\u00eb n\u00eb ve\u00e7anti, sepse do t\u00eb eliminohej instituti i aksionit afirmativ  si dhe p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimi i tyre autentik, andaj si i till\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb i pa pranuesh\u00ebm dhe diskriminues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

P\u00ebrfundimisht iniciativa  nga nj\u00eb organizat\u00eb joqeveritare p\u00ebr kufizimin e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs se  deklarimit t\u00eb qytetar\u00ebve p\u00ebr p\u00ebrkat\u00ebsin\u00eb e tyre komb\u00ebtare, gjuh\u00ebsore dhe fetare, paraqet mohimin e lirive dhe t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb njeriut si dhe t\u00eb vet demokracis\u00eb. Andaj nj\u00eb iniciativ\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb e vler\u00ebsojm\u00eb si t\u00eb pa baz\u00eb dhe irituese p\u00ebr qytetar\u00ebt  dhe opinionin e gjer\u00eb n\u00eb Mal t\u00eb Zi, n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb koh\u00eb t\u00eb pandemis\u00eb.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

( 3 n\u00ebntor 2020)<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Diskursi demografik Propozimi nga nj\u00eb OJQ q\u00eb n\u00eb regjistrimin e ardhsh\u00ebm t\u00eb popullsis\u00eb q\u00eb do t\u00eb mbahet n\u00eb Mal t\u00eb Zi n\u00eb muajin prill t\u00eb vitit t\u00eb ardhsh\u00ebm q\u00eb mos t\u00eb evidentohet struktura komb\u00ebtare, gjuh\u00ebsore e fetare e popullsis\u00eb sikurse n\u00eb regjistrimet e deritashme(1948-2011) \u00ebsht\u00eb irituese dhe e papranueshme, sepse \u00e7do qytetar p\u00ebrve\u00e7 emrit dhe […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":15799,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27385","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-aktualitet","category-opinione"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ulqini-online.com\/sajti\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27385","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ulqini-online.com\/sajti\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ulqini-online.com\/sajti\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ulqini-online.com\/sajti\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ulqini-online.com\/sajti\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=27385"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ulqini-online.com\/sajti\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27385\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27386,"href":"https:\/\/ulqini-online.com\/sajti\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27385\/revisions\/27386"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ulqini-online.com\/sajti\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/15799"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ulqini-online.com\/sajti\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=27385"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ulqini-online.com\/sajti\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=27385"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ulqini-online.com\/sajti\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=27385"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}